The debate around global service delivery models for A/R doesn’t easily come to a conclusion. Business leaders focused on global expansion face uncertainty as to which model would work best for them to achieve best-in-class status. Today, as more than 42% of UK businesses are more inclined to expand operations overseas, having this conversation is crucial for order-to-cash leaders dedicated to continued success.
There are three different service delivery models for Order-to-Cash leaders: GBS, Shared Services & Outsourcing. You need to understand the difference between each of the models and which one would be the right model for your A/R operations depending on where you are today.
To read more about outsourcing, shared services and GBS, we find this resource from HFS Research very helpful.
When it comes to deciding which model to choose and implement, there are multiple business factors to consider and the pros and cons of each model that you should be aware of.
Here are two-top parameters for you to keep in mind while selecting the right service delivery model:
1. Business Vision:
Leaders should self-assess the following criteria while planning for and selecting any service delivery model:
2. Costs Involved:
One of the most important factors to consider is the cost involved and ROI that could be delivered from the service implemented. Hence below are two important questions you need to ask yourselves.
The issue of “Outsourcing vs. Shared services vs. GBS” is a never-ending debate and the right answer requires an objective look at the unique requirements of each situation.
Outsourcing tends to make the most sense when an organization is looking for fundamental change, wants to move quickly in a short span of time, and views cost reduction as a top priority.
For sufficiently mature businesses, where the focus is not on just reducing cost but adding some value. A shared services approach enables more control over processes and outcomes, which reduces risk. This is especially important for key activities that are strategic to the business or bound by strict compliance requirements.
For leaders looking to transform their functions into a best-in-class service provider for the end-users as it supports organizational agility. Any organization wanting to stay at the forefront of its industry, the ability to react quickly to opportunities, threats, or critical economic considerations – GBS supports this.
The answer is ‘No’ – It depends. Choosing between outsourcing, shared services & GBS does not necessarily have to be an either/or decision. Many organizations use a hybrid model and are best served by a combination of outsourcing, shared services, and GBS—sometimes even within a single business function. Also, many activities can be managed effectively either way depending on the instance. For example, it would make sense that you decide to keep your critical and higher risk activities in finance such as Credit and Collections as in-house shared services whereas outsource the most transactional activities likely accounting and cash allocation to get significant results quickly, meanwhile also having centralized operations for other activities. In the long run, success is not just determined by the approach chosen, but how well it is getting executed.
5 Skills Every A/R Analyst Needs In…
The only way for A/R Analysts to stay relevant in an increasingly automated…
Five Steps For Driving Successful Digital Transformation…
A guide to scoping out an efficient digital A/R operation to deliver increased…
3 Stage Blueprint To Rebuild A/R For…
Gain insights into taking decisive, timely, and informed actions to manage your accounts…
HighRadius Integrated Receivables Software Platform is the world's only end-to-end accounts receivable software platform to lower DSO and bad-debt, automate cash posting, speed-up collections, and dispute resolution, and improve team productivity. It leverages RivanaTM Artificial Intelligence for Accounts Receivable to convert receivables faster and more effectively by using machine learning for accurate decision making across both credit and receivable processes and also enables suppliers to digitally connect with buyers via the radiusOneTM network, closing the loop from the supplier accounts receivable process to the buyer accounts payable process. Integrated Receivables have been divided into 6 distinct applications: Credit Software, EIPP Software, Cash Application Software, Deductions Software, Collections Software, and ERP Payment Gateway - covering the entire gamut of credit-to-cash.